Blog Page 2

‘Candyman’ Film to Explore Origin Story for Character, Delayed Until 2021

Nia DaCosta, who is directing the “spiritual sequel” to the 1992 horror classic, has said her take on the film will provide an in-depth look at how the killer (played by the great Tony Todd) actually came to be.

Speaking during her Virtual Fireside Chat at the Nightstream Film Festival, Nia explained:

“In the original, he’s already a fully formed … I guess monster, we’ll say, because that’s definitely how he’s positioned in the original film, as a monster.

“And so, it’s really like a reveal of, ‘Here’s my chest. I’m fully formed, I’m fully grotesque,’ and this one, we really wanted it to be a slow progression, and for me, I really wanted to trigger the response of like, you know when all of us have had a heat rash or something, and we’re like, hmm, what’s that?

The film has been delayed until 2021 because DaCosta says the film was created to be seen in theaters.

“We made Candyman to be seen in theaters. Not just for the spectacle but because the film is about community and stories–how they shape each other, how they shape us. It’s about the collective experience of trauma and joy, suffering and triumph, and the stories we tell around it,” she wrote on Twitter.

Mookie Betts Earns Free Taco Bell for All in Dodgers Game 1 Victory

0

Los Angeles Dodgers superstar Mookie Betts earned everyone in America a free Taco Bell taco after stealing a base in Game 1 of the World Series. Betts stole a pair of bases and hit a home run and ended the game with the third-highest WPA+ at 0.121. Cody Bellinger had the second-highest WPA+ (0.168) and arguably one of the most impactful moments of the game with his two-run blast in the bottom of the fourth that gave the Dodgers a lead they never relinquished.

It was Clayton Kershaw, however, with the best performance of the game overall. He struck out eight over six innings while giving up just one earned run. His game score of 71 was the second-highest of his career in the World Series. His highest and best performance was a 78 he put up against the Astros in Game 1 in 2017.

For the Miami Dolphins, Their Future is Now

0

The Miami Dolphins have made the decision to stick to their long-term plans by naming Tua Tagovailoa the starting quarterback ahead of their Week 7 bye.

Tua replaces Ryan Fitzpatrick, who helped Miami win its second game in a row and climb within one game out of first place in the AFC East.

With the Dolphins respectably in the playoff hunt and the only team in their division with a positive point differential, if the team falls short of at least a winning record this season it could be seen as a major disappointment to fans.

Fitzpatrick has completed 70.1 percent of his passes this season and thrown for over 1,500 yards. He has a 95.0 passer rating but has also thrown seven interceptions to go along with his 10 touchdowns.

Jeffrey Toobin was caught masturbating on Zoom. Here’s a look at the terms used to describe the ‘incident’ in news headlines.

0

Jeffrey Toobin lit up Twitter yesterday after news broke he was caught tuggin’ the toob on a work Zoom video meeting with colleagues at The New Yorker. A publication he has worked at for 25 years.

“I made an embarrassingly stupid mistake, believing I was off-camera. I apologize to my wife, family, friends, and co-workers. I believed I was not visible on Zoom. I thought no one on the Zoom call could see me. I thought I had muted the Zoom video,” Toobin said. 

Of the headlines published yesterday, 18 of them used the term “exposing” to describe the incident. 6 actually used “masturbating” and 3 used the word “penis”. It seems they’re trying to be polite. 

According to VICE, the call was an election simulation that involved many of the New Yorker’s top guests and producers from both the paper and WNYC. People with knowledge of the incident said those involved in the Zoom call had just returned from a 10-minute break when Toobin lowered the camera, which captured him touching his penis.

A word visualization of words used in news headlines detailing the incident.

Toobin apparently had no clue he could be seen on camera when he left the call and then came back moments later. How many people actually witnessed his masturbating has yet to be determined, but enough did that the news leaked.

Natalie Raabe, a spokeswoman for The New Yorker, released a statement saying Toobin has been suspended while an investigation is under way.

CNN, where Toobin is a Chief Legal Analyst, has also granted him “some time off” to “deal with personal issues” following the incident.

Toobin has spent his entire professional career building his reputation and seemed to completely blow it in a matter of minutes.

How Would Tax Evasion Charges Against a Former U.S. President Go? Here’s One Possibility.

Texas billionaire Robert Brockman has been charged by federal prosecutors with the largest tax evasion scheme in American history. According to Department of Justice officials, Brockman hid capital gains income over two decades through a tangled web of offshore accounts and business entities in Bermuda, Nevis, and Switzerland.

Robert and Dorothy Brockman attend an intimate al fresco dinner celebrating the Rice University groundbreaking of James Turrell’s Rice University Skyspace project at the home of Phoebe and Bobby Tudor, Tuesday evening, May 17, 2011, in Houston. (Dave Rossman/Houston Chronicle via AP)

The 39-count indictment was unsealed on Thursday with the core charges being tax evasion, wire fraud, and money laundering (along with a slew of other offenses).

“Complexity will not hide crime from law enforcement. Sophistication is not a defense to federal criminal charges,” said David L. Anderson, U.S. attorney for the Northern District of California. “We will not hesitate to prosecute the smartest guys in the room.”

This indictment and these charges would have never been possible without the cooperation of another billionaire who was involved in the scheme. Robert F. Smith, founder and chairman of Vista Equity Partners, agreed to pay $139 million to settle his own tax probe.

Reports initially surfaced in August that investigators from the IRS and Justice Department were looking into a possible tax fraud scheme involving Brockman. From then until Thursday when charges were formally announced investigators worked on building their case and triple-checking all the information they were receiving from Smith was actionable.

Prosecutors likely would not have announced they were investigating Brockman nearly two months ago had they not already had a strong foundation to charge him with a crime.

Why does all this matter?

If it takes many months (if not longer) to investigate and bring charges against an insanely wealthy private citizen, how long would you suspect it could take if the person prosecutors are investigating for tax-related crimes is the President of the United States?

Well, years. Mostly because as of right now, the common refrain is a sitting President cannot be indicted for criminal offenses. With that said, if Trump loses his re-election bid prosecutors could move very quickly to formally bring charges against him. If that were to happen early on in 2021 then Trump could find himself in an actual courtroom within the next couple of years after that.

As boring as these white-collar crimes can be when you read about them in the news, it’s important to pay attention to them as they could give clues to how prosecutors could potentially handle bringing charges against a former U.S. President.

 

 

Here’s How Twitter Locking White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany’s Personal Account is Being Reported by News Outlets

0
Online news publications covering White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany most frequently Oct 1 – Oct 15.

White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany finds herself at the center of news stories practically every day. This month alone, there have been nearly 200 stories published online from over 130 digital news publications. The latest coverage on McEnany and the controversy she finds herself in has nothing to do with whether she is or isn’t wearing a mask while speaking with reporters or hanging out at Rose Garden events.

This time she’s in the news because Twitter suspended her personal account after violating platform rules regarding sharing hacked material.

The rule specifically states:

“We don’t permit the use of our services to directly distribute content obtained through hacking that contains private information, may put people in physical harm or danger, or contains trade secrets.”

The story she shared was one published by the New York Post, which claims Democratic Presidential candidate Joe Biden’s son, Hunter, had been paid by the Ukrainian energy company Burisma Holdings in an alleged effort to obtain access to Biden for political reasons.

Biden has repeatedly denied the claims made in the published story, and already reports have surfaced that the material and information used for the story written and published by the New York Post was based on hacked, stolen, and even fabricated information.

McEnany spoke with Fox News’ Sean Hannity after being locked out of her account. However, it appears to have been restored since then and claimed Twitter “essentially had me at gunpoint and said unless you delete a news story published by the New York Post I cannot regain access to my account.”

“This is censorship, it is not the American way. This is not how a freedom-loving democracy operates,” McEnany continued.

“And we have to hold Twitter accountable. And Facebook, too, is banning the transmission of this story simply because ideologically, it hurts the side of the aisle the Silicon Valley prefers. It’s sad, it’s censorship, this is not America.”

Of the digital publications covering McEnany the most, here’s a look at the headlines related to this specific story.

Twitter locks Kayleigh McEnany Out of her account after spreading fake news – alternet.org
Twitter Suspends Kayleigh McEnany’s Personal Account for Sharing Hunter Biden Emails – breitbart.com
Power Mad Twitter Suspends WH Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany’s Personal Account – townhall.com
Twitter Locks Kayleigh McEnany’s Personal Account, Trump Campaign Says – dailycaller.com
Kaleigh McEnany’s Twitter is locked until she deletes Biden, she says – dailymail.co.uk

Here we can see that one publication has taken the approach of stating that McEnany’s Twitter account was locked because she was spreading “fake news.” Another describes Twitter as being “Power Mad.” Those two have clearly taken a side in how they are presenting their stories related to the topic and aren’t shy in doing so. Breitbart’s headline sticks to the facts of the story but also leaves out important context because of the questionable methods used to obtain the alleged emails and the legitimacy of the timeline of information presented in the New York Post story.

The other two headlines are fairly straight forward and don’t appear to have a bias either way, regardless of how the stories themselves are written and presented once you click through.

Given the frequency in which news stories are published online, shared on social media platforms, and then commented on and ‘presented’ to the public at large and even by news consumers (yes, to news organizations, you are a consumer), it can be challenging to decipher who’s telling the truth or simply where the truth lies within a story itself.

If you’d like to review the stories being published about this particular topic and McEnany herself, you can do so here. The data is open and free to download.

 

There’s Been a Rise in News Coverage for QAnon and That Should Concern All of Us

0

QAnon has been getting plenty of attention in the news lately, and concerns over the group and its followers have sparked so much attention from legislators, journalists, and anyone with a Twitter account that Congress has written and passed a bipartisan bill rejecting QAnon and condemning the conspiracy theories and violence it promotes. The resolution itself made sure to call out specific examples of the violence and criminal activity perpetrated by the group’s supporters, which has led to an increase in calls for law enforcement – the FBI specifically – to devote more resources towards combatting the conspiracy-driven acts of extremism and violence.

Some of the crimes committed by supporters of QAnon involve kidnapping, murder, and terrorism.

Below is a timeline of news coverage on QAnon from July 11 to October 1.

One thing that you can pick out from the graph is notable spikes in online stories being published. We’re going to take a look at each significant spike in news coverage to get a sense of what prompted the online news industry’s attention.

July 21 – 22

Twitter banned thousands of accounts associated with or directly belonging to QAnon members/supporters. These accounts were spreading conspiracy theories, calling for violence against elected officials of the democratic party or ‘liberals’ in general, and organizing protests against specific people or causes. All-in-all, Twitter banned over 7,000 accounts directly.

Many showed generous support for the move, but some believed even QAnon supporters deserve free speech.

August 11 – 14

Marjorie Taylor Green won her GOP nomination for the northwest Georgia US House seat. Green came out in strong support of QAnon, and in return, QAnon supporters showed great support for her. Despite the multiple racist videos she has made, and her backing of QAnon, President Trump and other prominent Republicans embraced her candidacy and victory. Trump even went so far as to call her a ‘future Republican star.’

Green winning her contest in Georgia was the big news for this period, which contributed to online news publications covering it more than 60 times over three days. However, a woman was also ordered to stand trial for her involvement in a QAnon kidnapping plot. That story was largely ignored and forgotten in favor of coverage on Green, Trump, and politics in general.

August 19 – 25

It didn’t take long for QAnon to begin trending in the news once again. Facebook announced they were following Twitter’s lead and banned over 800 group pages on Facebook, over 10,000 Instagram accounts, and 1,500 ads belonging to QAnon. With QAnon getting this much attention in such a short period of time, journalists began asking relevant and frequent questions to politicians about the group and where they stood on it.

Karl Rove condemned them as ‘a group of nuts and kooks,’ and said Trump ‘ought to disavow them.’

Senator Liz Cheney denounced the group as a ‘dangerous lunacy.’

Vice President Mike Pence said he didn’t “know anything” about QAnon and dismisses it “out of hand.”

President Trump, however, refused to condemn the group and went so far to say they ‘like me very much.’

Congress introduced the bill to condemn QAnon, with sweeping bipartisan support, on August 25

September 2 – 6

Former Vice President Joe Biden called the QAnon movement ‘mortifying’ and ‘dangerous’ and said QAnon conspiracies are a ‘deconstruction’ of our democratic system. Much of this time, news coverage of the group focused on what backers of the conspiracy group were doing. Additionally, supporters of QAnon were:

  • strongly pushing their propaganda around child sex trafficking, which had to be set straight by child sex trafficking organizations
  • publicly naming child molesters in government, without actual proof
  • spreading misinformation around and accusing the CDC of intentionally reducing the death count related to COVID-19

President Trump also spent time amplifying many of these conspiracy theories and messages touted by QAnon supporters on Twitter.

September 9 – 16

The meaningful stories that dropped during this last spike in online news coverage centered around Vice President Pence having been scheduled to attend a campaign rally and fundraiser hosted by QAnon backers in Montana. Pence’s team later stated that the Vice President would still go to the rally in Montana but not the fundraising event. GOP nominee for a Georgia House seat suddenly had a clear path to victory come November with her Democratic opponent, Kevin van Ausdal, suddenly dropping out of the race on September 11. He initially cited personal and family reasons for dropping out only to later clarify his wife served him with divorce papers, and he would be moving out of state. Then, some good ole’ fashioned McCarthyism began to occur when Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard and Senator Ted Cruz were both accused of ‘going QAnon’ after criticizing Netflix’s ‘Cuties’ film, which was the subject of much backlash for its perceived depiction and sexualization of pre-teen girls.

With a recent poll finding that a third of Republicans believe in all or parts of the QAnon conspiracy theories, it’s fair to wonder just how serious the threat of radicalization through QAnon is in the United States. They’ve found a way into being covered by mainstream media – online news publications, cable news outlets – as well as having supporters winning political campaigns that could potentially put them in Congress.

At what point does the QAnon conspiracy theories further erode our necessary faith in the goodness of others? Given our current political climate, it doesn’t seem as if it takes much to radicalize ordinary everyday folks anymore.

After all, could QAnon be the new Tea Party or even replace White evangelicalism to some degree among conservatives across the country, in turn invading our politics and government even more than it already has?

President Trump Provides the ‘Gaffes’ in First Debate

0

What in the hell was that? The first debate between President Donald Trump and former Vice President Joe Biden was a train wreck. It wasn’t completely useless, though. The President provided many opportunities for Biden to clap back at him with surgeon-like precision only to choose to do so a handful of times. When he tried to respond, Trump would simply shout him down and talk over him so you couldn’t actually hear what he would say.

But, this isn’t about what we heard or couldn’t hear from Biden. This is about the flow of gifts Trump provided Biden and his campaign directly from his mouth. One of the biggest takeaways from the debate was Trump seemingly unwilling to publicly denounce far-right domestic terror groups such as The Proud Boys and other white supremacists/nationalist organizations.

As a result, the Biden campaign has quickly capitalized on Trump’sTrump’s blunder (even though many were expecting Biden to supply all the gaffes) and released this ad.

This new ad successfully demonstrates a clear and obvious distinction between Biden and Trump. Biden is effectively highlighting how the president sides with violent, far-right organizations with a history of racism, misogynistic behavior/attitudes towards women, and threats of violence or actual physical violence against minorities or those with opposing political views.

Taking video clips from news stories concerning the protests, marches, and riots along with violent acts committed by those far-right groups with audio of Chris Wallace asking Trump to condemn those types of groups and his inability or outright refusal to do so reinforces a belief among many Americans that the President is a white supremacist himself, will use violence against all who oppose him and will encourage his coalition of white nationalist, militia group supporters to hurt those who try to vote him out of office.

How much of that is based in reality and what would actually happen versus being straight hyperbole doesn’t matter. What matters are the optics, and the President did himself zero favors during the debate with this one exchange. Whether he really is a closeted racist or just someone willing to use whatever ”tools” are at his disposal to get re-elected matters not. Politics is a blood sport. Trump should know that considering that’s how he’s treated his own business interests his entire career.

How to Make Researching Topics for Your Podcast (and even your blog) a Cinch

How much time are you spending researching the outlining/scripting phase for your podcast?

Having created, hosted, produced, and been involved in numerous podcasts or radio shows for others and myself, I can say the research process can become quite involved at times. And, as we all know, the quality of your finished product will have a direct correlation to the amount of time you invested in preparing for each show. This preparation involves quite a bit of research in many cases.

That means you need to gather all the relevant information you can so you can comfortably, and with confidence, speak about that topic at length. It doesn’t matter whether you can accomplish that last part in as little as 30 minutes or as much as 2-4 hours. What matters is being able to get to the information you need as quickly as possible.

Let’s say you have a 30-minute show. That’s half an hour of airtime you need to fill in some way. Let’s also say, in this hypothetical scenario, that your format is one where you (and probably a co-host) discuss current events. It doesn’t matter whether it’s in sport, politics, entertainment, or another category or industry. You’re covering and providing commentary on things that are happening or have happened recently.

A typical research process involves searching for what you need to know about something online through Google or other search engines and social media platforms. How quickly you can locate the information you need and determine how relevant it is to your show will help determine how much time you have to spend on that one part of creating your show before moving onto actually recording it.

What if you could take a shortcut and avoid going down those rabbit holes of useless information?

Search engines are useful, but there’s so much information being spat out at you. Not all of it is entirely relevant.

Social media platforms can be an excellent source for hot takes, statements made by athletes, politicians, entertainers, or other notable figures you may be covering, but social media platforms are rife with false information and outright fake news.

There’s a reason why you can’t trust everything you read on the internet.

I used to have many of those same issues. Whether my show was about sports, politics, tech, or current events in general – one problem I continuously ran into was the quality of the information I could get to and absorb promptly. Having to spend an hour or more researching relevant information to fill a 12-minute segment (or less in some cases) would only delay when I could be ready to record my show because it was never just one topic I needed to do research and gather news on.

Next thing you know, you’ve spent anywhere from a couple of hours to a dozen or more hours merely doing the necessary research to flesh out your script or outline so you could move onto the next phase in the production process.

Instead of resigning myself to the fact that I would forever be overly dependent on the information search engine algorithms would provide me based on what I’m searching for and leaning too heavily on questionable sources of information and news on social media, I refused. I knew there was value in being able to streamline my research activities. Doing so would help me get to the actual recording part of my shows sooner and alleviate a ton of stress around spending so much time doing one thing while trying to stick to a consistent publishing schedule.

My whole goal was to spend less time researching, still get all the information I needed, and spend more time recording, publishing, promoting, and moving onto the next one.

To accomplish that, I decided to help create and co-found a news media company that brings transparency to the digital news world. And would also make researching the news that much easier. Konsume.com helps bloggers, journalists, podcasters, and other media professionals gain insight into topics and trends that matter to them.

You’ll be able to very quickly see what is trending in the news that day, that week, and all the coverage in between. If your show is all about covering current events or trending topics, our trending tool will help you with that. If you need to find out exactly what’s being reported on a political figure, sports team, entertainer, or something else entirely, you can use the search tool.

And the same can be said if you want to quickly dive into what specific online news publishers report on and how.

It’s all right there for you. It’s also completely free.

For example, let’s pretend your podcast is one that covers politics, and on your next show you are doing a deep dive into former Vice President Joe Biden and his campaign for president. An initial search on Konsume would already highlight essential information for you. You’ll know right from the top that there have been nearly 5,000 news stories published from almost 400 online news publishers within the last 90 days. You also have a timeline of recent news coverage you’d be able to review quickly.

A Google search for “Joe Biden,” for example, would have netted you nearly 200 million results with the top ones being his campaign website and Wikipedia page. That doesn’t exactly tell you much about what he’s been up to lately or what he’s been in the news for.

Something else that would be immediately available to you is a timeline chart showing you the ebb and flow of news for this particular topic or person.

Now you have insight into what recent coverage looks like, the volume and frequency in which coverage is taking place, and how many different online news publishers drive these stories.

While that’s all super helpful, you’re also able to see which online news publications create those news stories quickly. This gives you a bit of a jump on knowing whether certain publications could have a particular bias in their reporting if coverage is largely being driven and over-saturated by one publication and if there’s even any balance.

There would be a list of recent stories published you can quickly scroll through. Not only does all of this make it so much easier for you to conduct meaningful research on a specific topic in the news, but it can also be a significant benefit to you when it comes time to think of other topics that are gaining traction online you could potentially cover. There’s also an ‘export’ function on these search results pages so you can download the data and view it in excel or another data visualization tool to take a more in-depth look into practically anything you would want.

Go ahead and give it a try for yourself. You might find it a useful tool that helps streamline your research process, if not act as an easy to use ‘idea factory’ for future shows. If you have any questions about using Konsume as a useful research tool or news platform yourself, let me know. I’m happy to answer any questions or help in any way I can. If you’d like to talk about your starting a podcast or growing the one you currently have – I’d love to talk about that too.

Online News Publishers Already Choosing Sides in Amy Coney Barrett SCOTUS Nomination

The mix of online news publishers covering Amy Coney Barrett and her nomination for the Supreme Court vacancy left behind by the death of Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg is quite telling. More than 300 stories have been published about Barrett since September 18 and 22% of that coverage has been produced by the 12 online publishers highlighted in the chart above. However, the bulk of this coverage comes from news outlets or publishers with very conservative leanings or bias in their reporting. Either through the stories they choose to publish or how they choose to ‘present’ the news to readers.

Just in this top 12 list half are right-leaning (designated with red), one is a religious publication (green), and one traffics mostly in misleading or false claims with a hard pro-life, anti-abortion slant (yellow). The remaining three (white) are neutral or local publications.

The way Barrett’s nomination is being covered by online news outlets right now really boils down to a pro-life versus pro-choice stance. Journalists, or perhaps it’s a direction chosen by the publisher in some cases, are casting Barrett as a devout catholic and proven conservative who will help overturn Roe -v- Wade. But, the key difference In those narratives is whether these stories published add in the ‘flavor’ of casting Barrett as either a villain to liberals and women’s rights or a hero of conservatives and family values.

Filling this SCOTUS vacancy would always be about pro-life or pro-choice, regardless of which party was doing the nominating. The type of demonization we see by those in the news media before Barrett’s nomination has even been taken up in the Senate is done as a way to serve specific types of newsreaders. In many ways, it just feels like another attempt at pandering to a divided nation and creating an ‘us versus them’ mentality even more than is already currently taking place due to the political and societal climate.