Nick Cordero’s wife, Amanda Kloots, posted an emotional update on the 41 year old Broadway actor’s condition. Cordero was hospitalized on March 30th and has been in the hospital since. He has suffered multiple complications from the virus and hospitalization including major lung infections and blood clots that necessitated the amputation of one of his legs. He was placed into a medically induced coma and was woken up this week. Kloots said this morning that today was a rough day and he has suffered more setbacks. It is unclear exactly what those setbacks are, but Cordero is still in the hospital.
Even with the filming of The Batman being shut down due to COVID-19 and the mere act of going to the movies radically changed – perhaps for the long-term – Batman is still a hot topic of discussion. Recently, one-and-done Batman Forever star Val Kilmer was the subject of a New York Times Magazine piece about his career. While Batman was an understandably small part of his extended body of work in which he’s played several iconic characters in addition to the Caped Crusader including Jim Morrison in The Doors and the legendary adult film actor John Holmes in the underrated Wonderland, he made salient points about it with which every actor who has played it would likely agree whether they were successful at it or not.
His experience playing Batman did not elicit anger, frustration or lamentation as it did for others, but the article said the following:
If you read his press around the time of “Batman,” all those interviews are mostly just him complaining about the suit; he liked to say it was “a battering experience” because he loves wordplay.
He remembered a story from his time as Batman. One day he was filming and about to take off the Batsuit when Warren Buffett and his grandkids came by. They wanted to see Batman, so Kilmer stuck around in the suit, but they didn’t want to talk to him. They wanted to try on the mask and ride in the Batmobile. He understood then that Batman isn’t meant to be a real guy. Batman is meant to be so anonymous that the person who is looking at him can see himself in him. “That’s why it’s so easy to have five or six Batmans,” he says now. “It’s not about Batman. There is no Batman.” And so what kind of thing is that to play, a person whose job is to be as nonspecific as possible. He looked good in the Batsuit, but wearing it was torture. When he took it off, he was finally free.
With Batman, the challenges the actors have faced tend to mirror each other regardless of whether they’re considered nice guys like Adam West and George Clooney, intense and difficult like Christian Bale, reluctant like Michael Keaton, and polarizing like Ben Affleck. Now, The Batman star Robert Pattinson is resisting the conventional wisdom – specifically, refraining from turning himself into a muscle-bound fighting machine.
Part of this is biological. For someone as lissome as Pattinson, gaining the weight necessary to carry off the look of Batman likely requires measures that go beyond lifting weights, ingesting quality calories and adhering to the old Hulk Hogan line of saying his prayers and taking his (over-the-counter) vitamins. In fact, there is an apparent chasm between what the studio wants him to look like and what Pattinson is willing to do to achieve the studio’s vision. Given that filming, though paused, is well underway, they really can’t fire him. It’s a “what are they gonna do about it?” act of defiance.
In short, he doesn’t want to work out. Whether Pattinson’s statement that people didn’t look like bodybuilders in the 1970s (evidently the setting of the film) is tongue-in-cheek or not, the easy retort to such a statement is that 99.9999% of people weren’t masked vigilantes bashing in criminals’ skulls every night.
You kind of need muscles for that.
There is the argument that a younger Batman would not be as bulky and filled out as an older Batman, but “I don’t wanna” undermines a script-based conscious decision not to gain size. If Pattinson is on screen looking like the vampire-teen from Twilight decided to become Batman, the script had better be masterful and his acting chops need to be on point to sell it. If the performance is vital to the film’s success, this is a departure from the other iterations of the character, including ones that were darker with a noir realism.
Of all the actors to play Batman, Pattinson is the youngest and least established. Ironically, that combination suggests that he doesn’t view his own position as such that he needs to put his stamp on the character under the misplaced belief that the fans are not just going to see Batman, but they’re going to see Robert Pattinson as Batman.
West was a working TV actor hired to do a campy TV version of the comic book as it was presented in the late-1960 with a sunnier, kid-friendly tone.
Keaton was a comedic actor who Tim Burton liked from their work on Beetlejuice and who was in the middle of a transition from goofy comedy to more serious fare with Batman the catalyst to worldwide stardom.
Kilmer was a handsome, leading man type who, despite his difficult reputation, had acting chops and moderate box office bona fides to inherit the cape and cowl from Keaton without a massive outcry comparble what Keaton endured when he was cast.
Clooney’s long road to leading man status was still in its upward trajectory and, despite the terribleness of the script for Batman and Robin, he had no choice but to accept the part knowing the likely outcome being mockery and never getting another chance at it.
Bale was a child actor who was known for putting full emotional and physical dedication into his performances including terrifying weight loss for The Machinist followed by the muscular bodyweight gain – that Pattinson has refused to do – to become Batman.
Affleck had only just shed his status as beefcake meathead known more for tabloid fodder and some horrible film choices by winning acclaim for directing The Town and Argo.
Of all these actors, Pattinson seems to have a mature understanding of the absurdity of it in ways the veteran actors did not; that Kilmer expressed in retrospect by saying he hated it and that it didn’t matter who was under the suit.
Before the film has wrapped, it appears as if Pattinson is realizing what he walked into. The Twilight films were ridiculous, but he was a young, pretty boy actor who needed to get his foot in the door. In subsequent performances, he’s carved out a niche in independent, art house-type films with critical acclaim to match his heartthrob looks. He’s known, but for many he’s not instantly recognizable simply by saying his name. It’s sometimes necessary to refer to him as “the Twilight guy” to get a person who does not recognize the name to know who he is.
This brings up the differences among the actors and where their careers were at the time they got the coveted gig, where they expected their careers to go and where they ended up.
West was never going to be a headlining movie star and the belief that Batman damaged him is misplaced. The affable West accepted and enjoyed his lot in life with self-deprecating humor as the guy who did the TV version of Batman and enjoyed a late-life renaissance as Mayor Adam West on Family Guy.
Keaton has become a sought-after dramatic actor, accepting parts in ensemble films and character-driven background parts. He mocked the yoke an actor is forced to endure after being a superhero on film and was nominated for an Oscar in Birdman or (The Unexpected Virtue of Ignorance). He became part of the Marvel Universe as the Vulture in Spider-Man: Homecoming and is expected to be in upcoming Spider-Man films.
Clooney is also a worldwide celebrity and activist, alternating between big budget blockbusters like the Ocean’s franchise and high-end storytelling with Michael Clayton, Good Night and Good Luck and Syriana.
Bale is a respected actor and A-list movie star despite a reputation like Kilmer’s for being hard to handle on-set and is also set to re-enter the superhero realm for Marvel by playing the unknown villain in Thor: Love and Thunder.
Affleck is still a prominent director and actor despite personal issues with alcohol and gambling. Ironically, it was his immersion into the Batman role that was as close as an actor has come to showing the true dichotomy, psychosis and fascism of Bruce Wayne and Batman. His problem was the material Zack Snyder saddled him with was opaque and rife with symbolism that sabotaged his good work and essentially infected the entire DC Universe to the degree that a reboot with Pattinson was necessary to begin with.
If an actor starts out thinking he’s going to bring his own “take” to Batman and Bruce Wayne, he’ll be sorely mistaken, disappointed and disillusioned. Hypothetically, if he’s granted some level of freedom to explore the character, that does not eliminate the conventional presentation of the dual roles that the studio will be pressured to adhere to.
Batman is a job that no actor can turn down, but most who take it end up regretting it to some degree. Yes, it advances their fame and extends their appeal perhaps to people who have not been interested nor aware of their work, but the secondary cost is high. Pattinson is taking it seriously, but not seriously to the point of fanaticism, spending all day in the gym or using steroids and HGH to gain 80 pounds to look the part when looking the part generally requires nothing more than putting the suit on, speaking in a growling monotone, punching, kicking and throwing the Batarang.
A film featuring the youngest ever Batman required a younger actor and, judging from Kilmer’s comments about the role, that younger actor – Pattinson – is showing a wisdom that belies his years as he walks in showing signs of knowing what the others only learned on the way out.
Rockstar is one of the biggest game developers in the world. Their track record has proven them to be at the highest of AAA quality games. Red Dead Redemption II proved that they are a development team capable of taking their time to make an experience that will push the boundaries of what you think is possible in a game. Grand Theft Auto V has also been doing this for years. So many that it has us looking forward to what we could see in the next iteration in the franchise. Here is a look at a few things we want in Grand Theft Auto VI.
A return to Vice City
Grand Theft Auto: Vice City was one of the games in the series released on the PlayStation 2 and Xbox, and as with the other releases on those consoles, one of the best games that generation. GTA 5 returned us to Los Santos, and GTA 4 brought back Liberty City. It is time that Vice City be brought back to current days.
More GTA Online
Unquestionably the most significant factor in GTA 5’s continued success has been Grand Theft Auto Online. The single-player mode is excellent, but the consistent updates Rockstar has dumped into the online have given it legs that ran the money machine for Rockstar for years. In GTA 6, it would be nice to see this be brought back with more. For starters, more heists (and make them available at release), more varied jobs, and just simply more to do in the world. 2020 makes seven years since GTA 5 released. It is time to see what Rockstar can come up with that does not feel like the same thing we’ve been doing in Los Santos for the last eight years.
Blur the line between online and single player
In GTA 5, it is easy to tell when you are playing online, or you are in a single-player game. GTA 6 should move to blur those lines a little more. The character you create in online can be the protagonist of the single-player story, and you could pull off single-player missions while playing online. It would give GTA more of an MMO feel. While we are at it, make those single-player missions playable cooperatively.
Improved Wanted Levels
Wanted Levels has arguably been the most significant inclusion that the GTA series has brought to video games. You do something wrong, and the cops chase you down until you’re dead. It is simple, but fun in every game. However, GTA 5 had one of the weaker Wanted Level systems in the series, and it might be time for a revamp. It is time for crimes committed away from the public not to summon phantom cops. If no one is around to see the crime, you should get away with it. GTA 5’s Wanted system is inconsistent, and some tweaks and a hard look at it could breathe new life into it. Also, bring back getting busted when they stop you in your tracks.
Do not pursue too much realism
Red Dead Redemption II is an unquestioned masterpiece of game design. However, a common complaint when it released was that Rockstar focused too much on some realistic facets of the game that took away from the fun of it. Grand Theft Auto is a series built on satire, destruction, and having the most fun by being a horrible person. Rockstar needs to focus on that rather than bringing a realistic, immersive feel to the game.
More interior gameplay
While GTA 5 has some instances where you can go inside, a next-generation title in the series should expand on it. More stores to shop and rob, pull off a burglary in NPCs houses, and give us more ways to escape the cops by hiding. By no means will this be a game-changer (outside gameplay will always rule the GTA experience), but it would be nice to see more opportunities for different environments.
Go back to a single protagonist
Having three protagonists to play as in GTA 5 had its values. Still, Rockstar’s focus on developing a story focused on a single character in Red Dead Redemption II made the campaign much better because of it. Like I said before, if they build a story around the character you create online, you can have a more focused story. No more dealing with Franklin’s abusive aunt or Michael’s annoying family. Which leads us to…
A better cast of side characters
Outside of the main protagonists in GTA 5, every character ranged from annoying to completely forgettable. Obviously, some of those characters are meant to be a satire on a certain kind of person in real life, but more often than not, interacting with any NPC made us want to skip dialogue more than hear what they had to say.
Better physical combat and gun gameplay
One of the more significant fixes Rockstar can pull on the GTA series is a revamp to the combat in the game. Fistfights in GTA 5 are always the same, dull animations and button pressing that does not feel great. It might be time to bring back physical attributes from Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas but expand on it. Maybe when you are in a better fighting condition, you can learn new moves. Gunplay could use some touch-ups as well. For being such a core part of Rockstar game’s formula, firing weapons have never really felt great. It is time to fix that going forward.
Better loading times
One of the biggest problems with starting up a Grand Theft Auto game has always been waiting for it to load. This has been a problem for so long that it feels ingrained in the series now. GTA 5 is the worst of the bunch, though. As more was added to the online mode, the longer the wait became to not only start the game but load up the overworld after a mission. One of the main focuses of the Xbox Series X and PlayStation 5 so far has been the improved loading times because of the switch to a solid-state drive over a hard disk drive. Rockstar should double down on this approach and make sure the wait is not too long.
Rebekah Jones, an analyst for the Florida Department of Health since 2018 has said that she was forced to resign her post as a manager of coronavirus data. The reason? That she was told to, and refused, censor data that would alter the COVID-19 numbers in Florida. The dashboard for Florida was one of the best in the country, with information about cases of the virus down to the actual zip code. It came under fire recently when media outlets noticed that some data were no longer in the system, something Jones implies was intentional. Governor DeSantis of Florida fanned the flames of outrage higher when he announced that this accusation was a “non-issue” and that the reopening would be going ahead as planned.
Tekashi 6ix9ine, the rapper who is known primarily for giving up information on everyone and anything as part of a plea deal, has accused Ariana Grande and Justin Bieber of buying thousands of copies of their own charity duet “Stuck with U.” Tekashi’s song, “GOOBA,” hit spot number 3 which was low enough that Tekashi’s team launched an investigation. He is claiming that 6 credit cards purchased 30,000 units of the duet. “When we asked where was those six credit cards linked to, Billboard said we can’t disclose that information,” Tekashi says in a video he released on this subject. Ariana Grande and Justin Bieber both deny the accusations.
For the second weekend in a row, protests were held in Munich, Berlin and Stuttgart over the nationwide lockdown instituted by Chancellor Angela Merkel. The turnout exceeded the permitted numbers in Munich and Berlin. Multiple counter protests sprang up at the location condoning the conspiracy theories that have become the hallmark of this virus. Another group based their discussion on the potential of being forced to vaccinate by Bill Gates. Germany instituted a mandatory mask policy, complete with a €300 fine. After last weeks protest over 300 tested positive for coronavirus so the fallout from this week remains to be seen.
Untied Airlines has received $5 billion dollars in government aid from the CARES Act and is paying all of its employees until September 2020. The airline informed its staff members that if the pandemic continues to decrease flight numbers it will only have work for 3,000 of its 25,000 flight attendants, with possible mass layoffs after the September deadline. They are reportedly losing $10 billion monthly. Delta has also announced that they will be cutting their pilot staff by about 50% if the situation does not resolve.
The house passed another stimulus package to help Americans with the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. The act barely passed, with a 208-199 split, and is unlikely to pass the senate. The new act, called the HEROES Act, would come with another round of stimulus checks and an extension of student loan interest suppression until September of 2021. The act would also increase the pay and health insurance coverage of essential workers. While some meet this new act with a sigh of relief, others have condemned it for putting America further in debt.
Going forward, every contract given to Major League Baseball players and athletes in general will either have a “pandemic clause” or the entire collective bargaining agreement will address the issue. Currently, however, MLB and the Players Association are at odds as to how a season would commence amid the ongoing COVID-19 epidemic.
Two basic factors that have been disputed and part of the factional, partisan disagreement as to when the national and state economies should reopen and what level of precautions to take are those of concern to MLB players: health and money. While the money athletes make is obviously mountainous compared to what even well-off everyday people do, who has the right to question their motives when they do what Blake Snell did and openly say he’s worried about his health and, more prominently, his finances?
Here’s Blake Snell discussing MLB’s revenue split proposal this afternoon on Twitch. pic.twitter.com/CCyCai42Aj
Snell, Trevor Bauer, Sean Doolittle, Bryce Harper, Alex Wood and others have been more outspoken about the risk/reward of playing during the pandemic as negotiations proceed. Even if it is relatively under control – still in question – by the time the season gets underway at the planned date of around July 4, these fears are valid.
For retired players like Mark Teixeira to suggest that players should simply return to the field for less money and placate the fans despite the risks and potential long-term ramifications is disingenuous at best. The odds that he would have said the same thing if he was at a similar point in his career as Snell or Bauer are questionable. Teixeira always treated his career like a businessman and being a businessman requires taking emotions out of the equation to a large degree.
Ex-#Yankees 1B Mark Teixeira on ESPN today: “I would rather make pennies on the dollar and give hope to people and play baseball than not make anything and lose an entire year off their career.” https://t.co/iqg5uI15Br
A prorated salary is a reasonable concession. A well-founded sticking point from the player perspective is if their salaries are suddenly tied to revenue without knowing how that revenue will be calculated as the owners cry losses and poverty. Now the MLBPA is asking for financial documents for proof as part of the negotiations. It’s safe to say that the owners will treat the request like President Trump has with his tax returns, say they will be disclosed at a later date, and simply kick the request as far down the road as they can and hope it will be ignored with the groundswell for some form of play sufficient to get the players to back down on various demands and get on the field.
Given the personal investment in sports and the larger than life personas of athletes, it’s easy to forget that they are human beings with employment, financial, health and family concerns just like anyone else.
Hypothetically, let’s say Mookie Betts, JT Realmuto, Marcus Stroman, George Springer, Marcus Semien, Justin Turner and Bauer shake their heads and say it’s simply not worth it for them to take the field given their pending free agency and the risks involved.
Being called money hungry and selfish is a small price to pay when confronted with the medical concerns related to the illness. It’s important to add in the possibility that these players are sacrificing their opportunity to sell their services to the highest bidder and set themselves and their families up for life financially with the accompanying issues of bringing an illness home, being separated from their families and taking the chance of getting injured for a perfunctory half-season played at neutral sites or in empty home stadiums. Being close in proximity to other people who cannot be watched 24/7 and who are subject to periodic tests that are neither preventative of catching the illness nor will be effective in knowing where every player is and what he’s doing in between tests is one of many aspects to consider.
It turns into a “Why am I doing this?” endeavor.
COVID-19 aside, what if Betts blows out a knee a month before the season ends? What if Stroman tears an elbow ligament and needs Tommy John surgery?
These were considerations that they needed to accept as they played the full season prior to their first shot at free agency. Now, it’s a truncated season for a fraction of their salary with owners seeking to reduce their compensation further with the virtual certainty that they will use the pandemic as a justification to limit the free agent offers players receive in a “never let a crisis go to waste” type of ghostly, ephemeral collusion.
If Betts needs to “settle” for $280 million instead of $380 million, with opt-outs and other sweeteners, he can recoup that if (when) it’s business as usual. The same holds true for younger players in Betts’ age range who are heading for free agency. Turner, 36 in November, will not get another big contract. Would he be wrong to say he’s not risking it?
The pressure will be enormous, but no one can force the players to play in this situation whether there’s an agreement between the owners and MLBPA or not.
What may happen is that owners will try a similar tactic as they did in 1995 and brought replacement players in, except in 2020, the players won’t be scabs in the union sense. Nothing can stop them from compelling young players who are relatively early in their career and are seeking to establish themselves as big leaguers to get on the field with the unsaid threat of “we can just send you to the minors” or imply disfavor in the organization that will not be forgotten at contract time.
The owners are showing such signs of desperation to get the product back on the field – within palatable financial parameters – that it is reasonable to ask if they are truly worried about the health of employees beyond fear of workers’ compensation if the employees get ill or lawsuits if they die. With the fans clamoring for the diversion of baseball, the owners are taking a calculated gamble while trying to implement proposals they have long sought but were roundly rejected during every CBA negotiation. Is it believable that they want to play for the fans? To a degree, yes. Is it likelier that they are thinking about financial considerations in the present and future and taking as much advantage of the pandemic as they can? Of course.
The protocol for play is ever-changing and will predominately hinge on selling the concept – illusory or tangible – of safety. The owners stand to lose financially no matter the outcome. The players will be damaged in their wallets as well, but they are the ones who will take the field and need to risk illness in doing so. Getting beyond the money, the accolades, the fame and the benefits inherent with being a professional athlete, it’s still a job. For them, it’s a job that regardless of its lucrative nature, lasts a relatively short time. Not all of them make hundreds of millions of dollars and it can all be gone in an instant with many not having the ability to do anything else a quarter as well as they play baseball.
Is it worth it for them? And what level of strong arm tactics are the owners willing to use to get a product – not the product, but a product – on the field?
These are questions the MLBPA doesn’t just have the right to ask, but must ask for the protection of its members. This goes beyond money and benefits. It’s about their entire lives. The more pressure the owners exert, the wiser it is for them to protest and ask exactly what they’re getting in exchange for what they’re being asked to give up.
Amid a rise in coronavirus cases across Central and South America this week, Brazil’s health minister, Nelson Teich, resigned after only four weeks in office. While his resignation letter did not state the reason he was leaving, he had very publicly denounced President Jair Bolsonaro reopening of gyms and salons this week. His predecessor, Luiz Henrique Mandetta, was relieved of duty by Bolsonaro when he criticized his handling of the coronavirus pandemic. The president has consistently called the coronavirus no more than “a little flu” and has suppressed lockdown measures.