Konsume

Konsume Report 2020: Digital News, Media Ratings and Insights on News Consumption

-

August 17, 2020

Konsume has compiled a report on the state of digital journalism in 2020, so far. We aim to provide insight into the 24-hour news cycle and showcase the most influential news publishers and the context of American news consumption.

To provide these insights, we have analyzed nearly 10 million news articles across 1,400+ major news publishers, written by tens of thousands of journalists worldwide, and all focused on a 90-day time span.

Also provided in this report are insights into the business of news publishing, how audiences engage with news, and why news publishers cater to an audience.

A View of the 24-Hour News Cycle

most news coverage is consumed from Tuesday to Thursday, with Wednesday being the peak.

Konsume Ranking of the Most Influential News Publishers

When it comes to the news’s biggest influencers, two things appear to have the most impact on news consumers. The first is the volume/frequency/consistency in which a news outlet is publishing fresh, unique content – simply put, how often are they breaking news stories. The other is how well they can effectively reach and engage with news consumers on the internet via social media.

Download the full report here:

Robert Prevost Becomes Pope Leo XIV, the First American Pontiff in Catholic History

Konsume Staff

-

May 8, 2025

0

Robert Prevost Becomes Pope Leo XIV, the First American Pontiff in Catholic History

In an unprecedented moment for the Roman Catholic Church, Cardinal Robert Francis Prevost of Chicago has been elected as the 267th pontiff, becoming the first American pope in the Church’s nearly 2,000-year history. Now known as Pope Leo XIV, his election represents not only a monumental shift in ecclesiastical tradition but also a striking testament to the evolving global face of Catholicism.

A Conclave That Made History

White smoke rose from the chimney of the Sistine Chapel on May 8, 2025, signaling the decision by the College of Cardinals. Their choice, Cardinal Prevost, marks a major departure from centuries of European dominance in papal selections. As a Chicago-born cleric and longtime missionary in Peru, his appointment resonated with Catholics around the world who seek broader representation in Church leadership.

Prevost was chosen during a relatively quick conclave, suggesting early consensus among cardinals. According to the Associated Press and CNN, his reputation for compassion, sound governance, and a pastoral focus made him a natural choice. In his first public address, he greeted the world with “Peace be with you,” emphasizing his desire for unity and dialogue in an era of division.

From Dolton to the Vatican

Born in 1955 in Chicago and raised in Dolton, Illinois, Prevost’s spiritual journey began early. He attended St. Mary’s parish, where he was deeply influenced by the local clergy. A neighbor once told him he would become pope, a statement that was once playful but now prophetic.

He joined the Augustinian order and dedicated decades of his life to missionary work in Peru, earning admiration for his dedication to social justice and his pastoral care. His understanding of Latin America, home to a significant portion of the world’s Catholics, helped him connect across cultures and continents.

In 2023, Pope Francis appointed him to lead the Vatican’s Dicastery for Bishops, a role with significant influence over the global hierarchy of the Church. His effectiveness in that position, along with his experience in both pastoral and administrative roles, made him a strong candidate for the papacy.

Why the Name Leo XIV?

Choosing the name Leo XIV, Prevost paid homage to Pope Leo XIII, who served at the turn of the 20th century and was known for his intellectualism and forward-thinking views on workers’ rights and social teachings. Vatican historians interpret the name as a signal of Pope Leo XIV’s intent to blend tradition with reform and thoughtfulness.

His first words as pope echoed this dual mission. He called for a Church rooted in peace, humility, and engagement with the world’s most pressing challenges, including inequality, migration, and internal Church divisions.

The End of an Era, and the Start of Another

The idea of an American pope had long been considered unlikely. For decades, there was concern that the political and economic power of the United States could be conflated with ecclesiastical authority, making such a choice seem imprudent. Prevost’s election challenges that assumption and indicates a shift in global Catholic consciousness.

“This isn’t about geopolitics,” said Archbishop Bernard Hebda. “This is about the spiritual needs of a global Church. Robert Prevost has the heart of a pastor and the mind of a reformer.”

Outlets like the East Oregonian and La Times Español described the decision as reflective of the changing demographics of Catholicism, where the faithful are increasingly found in the Americas, Africa, and Asia.

Celebrations Across Continents

The announcement was met with jubilation in Chicago, where residents of Dolton and surrounding communities expressed pride in their hometown priest. At St. Mary’s, the parish where he once served as an altar boy, parishioners gathered to pray and celebrate.

Elsewhere, responses varied from surprise to hope. In Latin America, many saw in Pope Leo XIV a bridge between the Vatican and the developing world. At Providence College in Rhode Island and across dioceses in Florida and Nevada, reactions were marked by both astonishment and optimism.

Challenges Ahead for Leo XIV

As with all papacies, the road ahead is filled with trials. The Church continues to wrestle with internal tensions over doctrine, scandals related to abuse and transparency, and calls for modernization. Social media posts from Prevost’s past have already sparked debate, with some groups raising questions about his stance on LGBTQ+ rights and U.S. political issues.

Nonetheless, those who know him describe him as open-minded, thoughtful, and committed to dialogue. According to Vatican correspondent Vanessa Gera, “He listens even when he disagrees. That is a rare and vital quality for this moment.”

Leo XIV will also face global humanitarian challenges, including war, migration, and climate change, which have placed new moral demands on religious leadership. His papacy will be watched closely for signs of how he intends to lead in this new era.

A Moment for the Ages

For many Catholics, the election of Pope Leo XIV represents not just a change in leadership but a profound moment of inspiration. His life story, from the streets of Chicago to the pulpit of St. Peter’s Basilica, captures a broader narrative about faith, perseverance, and service.

Coverage from Time, National Geographic, and other international media outlets noted the symbolic power of his first blessing and his clear call for peace and unity. One neighbor from Dolton remembered how local kids once “played Mass” with the young Robert. “He always wanted to be a priest,” said his brother. “He never wanted to be famous, just faithful.”

In stepping onto the balcony as Pope Leo XIV, Robert Prevost offered more than a greeting. He offered a glimpse into the Church’s possible future—one more inclusive, more global, and more attuned to the cries of the world.

Mark Carney’s Ascent: How a Banker-Turned-Leader Galvanized Canada Amid a Political Storm

Konsume Staff

-

May 7, 2025

0

Mark Carney’s Ascent: How a Banker-Turned-Leader Galvanized Canada Amid a Political Storm

In the early months of 2025, few would have predicted that Mark Carney, a former central banker with no elected political experience, would not only become Canada’s 24th prime minister but do so amid a constitutional and economic crisis of historic proportions. Carney’s rapid ascent and unexpected popularity were fueled not by a traditional political campaign, but by an adversary across the border: U.S. President Donald Trump.

From Finance to Politics

Mark Carney, born March 16, 1965, in Fort Smith, Northwest Territories, was best known for his leadership at the Bank of Canada from 2008 to 2013, and later at the Bank of England until 2020. His reputation as a steady hand during financial crises earned him international acclaim. However, when he was chosen by Canada’s Liberal Party in March 2025 to succeed Justin Trudeau, who resigned amid declining popularity, Carney faced skepticism about his ability to transition from technocrat to statesman.

His selection came as Canada was reeling from U.S. tariffs, skyrocketing inflation, and strained relations with its largest trading partner. Carney’s economic pedigree, coupled with a calm demeanor, made him an appealing figure in uncertain times. Within days of being sworn in on March 14, Carney called a snap election for April 28 to seek a public mandate.

The Trump Factor

What transformed Carney from caretaker leader to political force was U.S. President Donald Trump’s increasingly antagonistic rhetoric. Trump’s sudden proposal to annex Canada as the “51st state,” along with sweeping tariffs on Canadian goods, galvanized Canadian public opinion. Trump’s dismissive tone towards Canada and its leadership, including calling Carney’s visit to the White House unnecessary and branding Canada’s economy as weak, triggered a surge in nationalistic sentiment north of the border.

Rather than shrink from the provocation, Carney leaned into it. He delivered a series of sharp rebukes, declaring Canada “was not for sale” and promising retaliation for what he termed a “direct attack” on Canadian workers. His fiery rhetoric resonated with voters disillusioned by Trump’s heavy-handed trade policies and perceived disrespect.

Election Strategy and Victory

Carney’s campaign was a masterclass in crisis framing. He centered the election around a simple but potent narrative: defending Canadian sovereignty and economic independence. His key opponent, Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre, tried to match Trump’s populist tone with a “Canada First” slogan, but it failed to gain traction. Carney, meanwhile, projected himself as a rational, experienced leader facing an unpredictable foreign threat.

Despite entering the race as an unelected leader, Carney led the Liberals to a minority victory, securing 169 of 343 seats in Parliament. The campaign had turned into a referendum on Trump’s treatment of Canada, and voters responded by giving Carney the mandate he sought.

High-Stakes Diplomacy in Washington

Within a week of his election win, Carney traveled to Washington for a tense meeting with President Trump. The summit, held on May 6, was described as one of the most contentious bilateral engagements in recent memory. Trump, in a now-viral moment, told reporters he was “the greatest thing that happened” to Carney, suggesting the Canadian PM owed his win to the U.S. president.

Carney responded with a mix of diplomacy and defiance. He firmly rejected the annexation notion and countered that Canada would respond in kind to any further tariffs. Trump, undeterred, floated the idea of Canadian statehood as a “wonderful marriage,” to which Carney laughed but reiterated Canada’s autonomy.

Challenges at Home

While Carney’s handling of Trump has won him domestic support, he faces significant internal challenges. Canada’s economy remains vulnerable to external shocks, and Carney must balance fiscal prudence with social investment. His minority government means navigating alliances in Parliament, particularly with the New Democratic Party (NDP), although he has ruled out a formal pact.

Carney has also been criticized by conservative leaders, notably Alberta Premier Danielle Smith, for what they see as dismissiveness toward Western concerns. At the same time, he has sought to reassure those regions by emphasizing infrastructure investments and energy policy reform. His leadership style—pragmatic, data-driven, and often technocratic, is a departure from Trudeau’s more charismatic approach.

A Global Outlook

Beyond Trump, Carney has begun positioning Canada as a bulwark of liberal democratic values in a fracturing global order. His first foreign visit as prime minister included meetings with French President Emmanuel Macron and U.K. officials, signaling a pivot towards deeper transatlantic partnerships. Carney’s experience in international finance makes him a natural interlocutor in complex global negotiations, from climate policy to trade.

He is also navigating scrutiny over his past business ties, particularly with Brookfield Asset Management, a relationship that critics argue could pose conflicts of interest. Carney has pledged transparency, but the issue remains a point of contention.

The Road Ahead

Mark Carney’s tenure began under extraordinary pressure, yet he has thus far defied expectations. He transformed from an unelected economist into a national figurehead largely by standing up to an external threat. However, his long-term success will depend on more than anti-Trump rhetoric. Canadians will judge him by his ability to deliver economic stability, protect national interests, and foster unity in a politically fragmented landscape.

The honeymoon phase may be short. But for now, Carney stands as a symbol of resistance, not just against foreign antagonism, but against the idea that technocrats cannot lead with conviction in times of crisis.

Netflix 2025: Growth, Shifts, and Strategic Retreats in the Streaming Giant’s Playbook

Konsume Staff

-

May 1, 2025

0

Netflix entered 2025 on a high note, riding a wave of record-breaking subscriber growth and surging viewership across Asia. Yet the company is simultaneously retreating from earlier experimental initiatives and recalibrating its content and platform strategy. The streaming behemoth, now with more than 300 million subscribers worldwide, is redefining what it means to lead in a market saturated with competition, scrutiny, and rapidly evolving audience demands.

Subscriber Surge and APAC Momentum

In the fourth quarter of 2024, Netflix added approximately 19 million subscribers—the highest quarterly increase in the company’s history—bringing its total global subscriber count past 300 million. The achievement stunned industry watchers and analysts alike, with Bernstein analysts reportedly double-checking the numbers, suspecting a data error. The driver behind this growth was twofold: an aggressive expansion of Netflix’s ad-supported tier and a content lineup that resonated across diverse global markets.

Particularly notable was the platform’s performance in the Asia-Pacific region. Netflix reported that APAC film viewership increased by nearly 20% in 2024. This growth was driven in part by regionally tailored content, including the Japanese action-comedy City Hunter, South Korea’s martial arts drama Officer Black Belt, and India’s historical thriller Maharaj. Netflix executives emphasized the importance of developing localized stories that could travel internationally, a strategy that appears to be paying off.

Rethinking Gaming: A Quiet Exit

Despite its public push into the gaming industry just a few years ago, Netflix has begun to walk back its ambitions. In early April 2025, the company confirmed the discontinuation of its interactive fiction platform, Netflix Stories. The mobile app, which featured gamified storylines based on hit shows like Emily in Paris and Selling Sunset, will no longer see new content. Planned releases for Ginny & Georgia and Outer Banks sequels were shelved as part of the platform’s wind-down.

The retreat coincides with internal leadership changes. Mike Verdu, the company’s inaugural head of games and later VP for generative AI in gaming, departed the company in early 2025. Alain Tascan, who joined Netflix from EA and Ubisoft, had taken the reins in mid-2024. Though Netflix maintains it remains committed to gaming, the closure of Netflix Stories signals a strategic narrowing of focus—perhaps toward more traditional or console-integrated game development.

Sports Streaming: Focused, But Not Traditional

Another strategic restraint appeared in the sports category. In April, Netflix CEO Ted Sarandos confirmed that the company is unlikely to pursue a broadcasting deal with the UFC, despite ongoing speculation amid the expiration of the UFC’s deal with ESPN. Instead of committing to full-season contracts, Sarandos reaffirmed Netflix’s focus on one-off live events that align with “breakthrough” branding moments.

This approach echoes previous Netflix events such as the Chris Rock live comedy special and the global fanfare of the Squid Game: The Challenge reality competition. By avoiding the expensive and logistically complex world of traditional sports broadcasting, Netflix is choosing high-impact, episodic events that maximize buzz without requiring long-term commitments or infrastructure.

Content Breadth and Celebrity Collaborations

While pulling back in some areas, Netflix continues to broaden its content horizons elsewhere. The platform has been heavily promoting new series like The Four Seasons, a comedy starring Tina Fey and Steve Carell, and developing an expanding library of international titles. Recent headlines also suggest an aggressive investment in Korean content, including its first original animated film from Korea and the horror-fantasy series Perfect Job.

Netflix also remains keen on nostalgia and classic cinema. The streamer announced a curated screening series in New York featuring works by Alfred Hitchcock, including Rear Window, Vertigo, and The Birds. These additions aim to court both cinephiles and younger viewers unfamiliar with golden-age film icons.

Controversies and Cultural Headlines

Not all headlines have been celebratory. Meghan Markle, who has an ongoing content deal with Netflix, was the subject of multiple tabloid stories alleging poor on-set behavior and the unexplained absence of her culinary contributions at a Netflix-themed restaurant event. Meanwhile, the British series Adolescence faced controversy after Elon Musk amplified unfounded claims about its content, forcing Netflix to defend its educational use in Dutch schools.

Perhaps the most eyebrow-raising moment came with the resurfacing of Kevin Spacey’s House of Cards character in a promotional skit for comedian Tim Dillon’s Netflix special. The cameo drew both curiosity and criticism, highlighting the thin line Netflix often walks between edgy marketing and reputational risk.

The Bigger Picture: A Platform in Transition

The convergence of Netflix’s choices reveals a company shedding excess and sharpening its identity. It is abandoning half-formed experiments like Netflix Stories while doubling down on areas of proven success: international expansion, live event experimentation, and character-driven premium content.

As the streaming landscape matures and consumer attention continues to fragment, Netflix’s ability to pivot with precision will determine its staying power. While 2025 has already delivered impressive subscriber wins and regional growth, the real test lies ahead: sustaining momentum in a marketplace where novelty fades fast.

With a clearer sense of what works and a willingness to walk away from what doesn’t, Netflix appears poised not just to survive the next evolution of streaming, but to lead it.

Leaks, Loyalty, and ‘SignalGate’: Inside the Chaos of Hegseth’s Pentagon

Konsume Staff

-

May 1, 2025

0

WASHINGTON — In the span of just over three months, U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth has gone from a fiercely contested appointee to a political lightning rod, drawing scrutiny from Congress, the Pentagon, and the American public. Since his razor-thin Senate confirmation in January, Hegseth’s tenure has been marked by scandal, security breaches, political theater, and sweeping policy upheaval.

This article examines how Hegseth’s time at the helm of the Pentagon has unfolded, tracing key events and controversies that have defined his leadership—and may ultimately end it.

A Controversial Confirmation
Pete Hegseth, a former Army officer and Fox News host, was a polarizing pick from the outset. Nominated by President Donald Trump for his second-term Cabinet, Hegseth faced allegations of past misconduct, including excessive drinking and aggressive behavior toward women. Senate hearings revealed he paid $50,000 to settle a 2017 sexual assault accusation, and a sworn affidavit from his former sister-in-law described abusive conduct toward his ex-wife.

Despite bipartisan concern, including dissent from Republican Senators Lisa Murkowski and Susan Collins, the Senate confirmed Hegseth in a 51–50 vote on Jan. 24, 2025. Vice President J.D. Vance cast the deciding vote.

Hours later, Hegseth was sworn in as the 29th Secretary of Defense. What followed was a rapid cascade of decisions and disasters that have since upended the Pentagon’s stability.

Scandal After Scandal: “SignalGate” and Security Breaches
The biggest crisis facing Hegseth is what media outlets have dubbed “SignalGate.” Reports first emerged in late March that Hegseth had used the encrypted messaging app Signal to share military strike plans for Yemen with non-government individuals, including his wife, brother, and a journalist.

The Pentagon’s inspector general launched an official investigation, and further reporting uncovered a second Signal group chat involving sensitive information. One leak included the planned time for a targeted killing operation—information reportedly extracted from secure military channels.

In a televised Fox News interview, Hegseth deflected blame, claiming the messages were “non-classified context chats.” Critics, including Rep. Jack Reed (D-R.I.), the top Democrat on the Senate Armed Services Committee, weren’t satisfied. “This isn’t about politics,” Reed told NPR. “This is about safeguarding our national security.”

Multiple Republican lawmakers have either remained silent or expressed tepid support. Yet calls for Hegseth’s resignation have grown louder, including from former National Security Adviser John Bolton, who stated, “He should resign for his own safety’s sake.”

Turmoil Inside the Pentagon
In April, the Pentagon began to resemble a revolving door. Five senior officials resigned or were fired within one week. Among them were Dan Caldwell, a senior adviser; Joe Kasper, Hegseth’s chief of staff; and Darin Selnick, a deputy. Insiders described the department’s atmosphere as “chaotic” and “paranoid,” with Hegseth reportedly threatening to polygraph military officers over leaks.

Reports also revealed that Hegseth had an unsecured internet line installed in his office, allowing him to bypass Pentagon cybersecurity protocols to access Signal. This move, sources say, was done without proper authorization and added to the perception of recklessness.

Adding to the turmoil were accusations of nepotism. Hegseth appointed his younger brother, a podcast host, to a senior advisory role at the Department of Homeland Security, and brought his wife—a former Fox News producer—to classified military meetings abroad. Pentagon insiders expressed discomfort with her constant presence, reportedly giving her an unflattering nickname.

Image Management or Vanity?
Alongside mounting scandals, Hegseth drew ire for installing a “makeup room” in the Pentagon, reportedly costing thousands in taxpayer funds. Intended for television appearances, the green room-style studio became a punchline on cable news and late-night TV.

Fox News host Howard Kurtz defended the move, but other conservatives questioned the optics. “We’re cutting budgets and he’s building a glam counter?” one anonymous GOP staffer told Politico.

Critics argue the makeover symbolizes Hegseth’s broader approach: a media-first, substance-second leadership style that’s alienated career defense officials.

Policy Shifts and Hardline Nationalism
Despite the controversies, Hegseth has moved aggressively on several policy fronts. His worldview aligns tightly with Trump’s “America First” doctrine, marked by skepticism toward international alliances and support for cultural conservatism in the military.

In February, Hegseth declared Ukraine’s NATO membership bid “unrealistic,” and called for the West to pursue “diplomatic exit ramps” rather than prolonged conflict. This dovetailed with Trump’s broader skepticism of NATO and was sharply criticized by allies and bipartisan members of Congress.

Later, Hegseth reversed the renaming of Fort Bragg to Fort Liberty—undoing a Biden-era initiative to remove Confederate names from military bases. He also ordered the dismantling of the Pentagon’s Women, Peace and Security program, dismissing it as a “woke” holdover despite the fact it was originally signed into law by Trump.

On China, Hegseth took a more confrontational tone, claiming he could “feel the communism” in the Panama Canal and vowing to “take it back.” The comment prompted protests in Panama and a sharp rebuke from Beijing.

Border Deployments and Culture War Focus
Domestically, Hegseth has redirected military assets to address illegal immigration. He ordered a Stryker Brigade and aviation battalion to the U.S.-Mexico border in March and visited Guantanamo Bay, calling it “the front line” in border security.

He also targeted internal Pentagon culture, instructing military leaders to review equal opportunity programs and calling the phrase “diversity is our strength” the “dumbest in military history.” These moves pleased some conservative commentators but raised alarm among civil rights advocates.

Is His Time Running Out?
As of May 1, pressure continues to mount. News broke that President Trump met privately with Hegseth last week, reportedly urging him to “get it together.” While Trump has publicly defended his defense secretary, describing him as “my least controversial person” in a sarcastic jab at the media, insiders suggest the administration is already exploring successors.

Meanwhile, Democrats in the House attempted to force a formal investigation into SignalGate but were blocked by Republicans. Rep. Adam Smith (D-Wash.) described the maneuver as “a sign the GOP knows he’s indefensible.”

Fox News is reportedly prepared to rehire Hegseth should he be dismissed—a sign that his political life may not be over, even if his government role is nearing its end.

Conclusion
Pete Hegseth’s rapid descent from freshly confirmed Cabinet member to embattled liability underscores the risks of elevating media personalities to top government roles. While his tenure has delivered clear policy shifts in line with Trump’s nationalist vision, it has also destabilized the Pentagon, endangered operational security, and prompted bipartisan concern.

Whether he remains in his post or is forced to resign, Hegseth’s brief reign as secretary of defense will be remembered as one of the most controversial and divisive in modern American history.

Hakeem Jeffries Faces Mounting Scrutiny Amid Defiant Messaging and Party Fractures

Konsume Staff

-

April 30, 2025

0

Hakeem Jeffries Faces Mounting Scrutiny Amid Defiant Messaging and Party Fractures

WASHINGTON — House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries is under growing pressure from both political opponents and Democratic voters, as he continues to navigate a contentious relationship with the Republican-led government while facing doubts about his leadership from within his own party.

In the past two months, Jeffries has been at the center of a flurry of headlines, ranging from defending his leadership decisions to rallying Democrats against Republican budget proposals. He most recently denied reports that he discouraged Democratic lawmakers from traveling to El Salvador, a claim he called “categorically false” in interviews across multiple Sinclair-affiliated outlets on April 30.

Jeffries has publicly questioned President Donald Trump’s cognitive fitness and accused him of “crashing the economy in real-time,” while also lambasting the administration’s proposed Medicaid cuts and education book bans. He joined Sen. Cory Booker in a Capitol sit-in on April 27, opposing the GOP budget plan and energizing the party’s progressive base.

But Jeffries is also contending with internal challenges. He’s repeatedly dodged questions about his relationship with Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, fueling speculation of tension between House and Senate Democratic strategies. On March 14, reporters pressed him over Schumer’s role in passing a Republican stopgap bill, prompting evasive responses and headlines questioning Democratic unity.

The backlash isn’t only from Republicans. Prominent liberal commentators, including MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow, have pressed Jeffries to adopt a more confrontational tone, warning of a perceived lack of urgency in countering Trump’s agenda. Others, like columnist Chuck Todd, noted the party’s leadership appears “paralyzed” by fear of a left-wing revolt.

Despite mounting frustrations, Jeffries has signaled resolve. On March 25, he issued a formal demand for Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s firing following a controversial military group chat scandal, highlighting ongoing Democratic concerns over national security and executive overreach.

The tension reflects a broader reckoning for Democratic leadership in the minority. As one March 18 New Republic headline put it, “Voter Literally Begs Hakeem Jeffries for Dems to Stand up to Trump.”

With the 2026 midterms looming and President Trump’s policies reshaping Washington, Jeffries faces the difficult task of uniting a fractured party, countering Republican momentum, and proving he can lead Democrats out of a political wilderness.

Tulsi Gabbard’s Turbulent Rise as Director of National Intelligence

Konsume Staff

-

April 16, 2025

0

Tulsi Gabbard’s Turbulent Rise as Director of National Intelligence

Over the past few months, Tulsi Gabbard has undergone one of the most polarizing and rapid ascents in recent U.S. political memory—confirmed as Director of National Intelligence (DNI) under a returning Trump administration, triggering a media firestorm, bipartisan backlash, and a string of controversies that refuse to let up.

Gabbard’s confirmation, finalized in mid-February 2025, was a lightning rod for criticism. A former Democratic congresswoman turned independent firebrand, Gabbard was scrutinized during Senate hearings for her past praise of Bashar al-Assad, her ambiguous stance on Edward Snowden, and her perceived coziness with Russia. Despite opposition from Democrats and a few skeptical Republicans, Gabbard was pushed through with Trump-aligned backing, aided by GOP figures like Susan Collins and intense lobbying from Trump allies.

Since taking office, Gabbard has wasted no time reshaping the intelligence community in her image. She quickly made headlines by revoking the security clearances of dozens of former officials, including critics like Antony Blinken and Alvin Bragg. In a particularly explosive move, she announced the dismissal of over 100 intelligence officers due to “egregious violations of trust” involving sexually explicit chatroom activity on NSA platforms. These firings drew both praise from hardliners and alarm from civil liberties watchdogs.

Her tenure has been characterized by a heavy-handed crackdown on what she calls “deep state rot.” Gabbard launched a task force targeting internal abuses at U.S. spy agencies, advocated for the declassification of surveillance programs, and publicly lambasted CNN as a “propaganda arm of the CIA.” At the same time, she has been accused of politicizing her role—yanking clearances from high-profile Democrats, shielding Trump loyalists, and downplaying international concerns like climate change in intelligence briefings.

Internationally, her remarks have sparked diplomatic friction. Her criticism of religious violence in Bangladesh and comments on Sikh separatist movements have drawn rebukes from both South Asia and civil society groups. And in a speech that raised more than a few eyebrows, Gabbard described Trump as the “Peace President” despite his administration’s aggressive drone strikes.

Meanwhile, her public messaging leans heavily on themes of anti-establishment reform, national sovereignty, and surveillance transparency—but critics accuse her of flip-flopping on issues like FISA Section 702 just to secure Senate confirmation. The contradictions have not gone unnoticed. Headlines point to her past positions on civil liberties, now at odds with her current hawkish policies.

Compounding her controversial tenure are security threats: Gabbard and her husband were recently targeted in a violent death threat case, which the DOJ is now prosecuting.

What’s unfolding is a political saga that reflects the deep fractures in Washington—between surveillance and privacy, loyalty and dissent, Trumpism and traditional intelligence norms. Whether Gabbard’s tenure will mark a lasting shift in how the intelligence community operates or serve as a cautionary tale remains to be seen. But one thing is clear: she has placed herself at the very heart of America’s surveillance state—and lit a fire under it.

The Future of Journalism Might Just Be on the Blockchain

Konsume Staff

-

March 30, 2025

0

The Future of Journalism Might Just Be on the Blockchain

Byline: Konsume Staff, Rashida Arsiwalla

There was a time—not so long ago—when a newspaper landing on your doorstep meant something. It thudded with purpose. Editors held firm control, and journalism stood as a powerful watchdog. Exposés could bring down presidents, unravel corporate giants, and shine light into the darkest corners of society. Investigative journalism didn’t just report the news—it shaped the world.

Fast forward to today, and that same industry is teetering on the edge.

A Changing Landscape

The threats to journalism are both old and new. Newsrooms have been gutted by budget cuts, victims of vanishing ad dollars and the rise of digital platforms that favor clicks over substance. Independent media has largely been swallowed by massive corporations, where decisions are made less for the public good and more for quarterly earnings. Between 2008 and 2020, newsroom jobs in the U.S. dropped by more than a quarter.

Social media, once hailed as the dawn of citizen-powered news, now serves as a breeding ground for misinformation. Engagement—often driven by outrage, not accuracy—shapes what people see. And the public? Many no longer know whom to trust. A recent Pew Research study revealed record-low confidence in the media, with political division and suspicion of hidden agendas driving the skepticism.

In this climate of confusion and distrust, a surprising idea has emerged: What if blockchain could help rebuild trust in journalism?

Can Blockchain Help Save the News?

Originally designed to power cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin, blockchain is essentially a public, unchangeable ledger—a digital record book that anyone can see, but no one can alter. It’s transparent, tamper-proof, and decentralized. In theory, those qualities make it a compelling tool for journalism.

“Public blockchains are ideal for independent investigations because they make data accessible,” says Manoj Sharma, a writer and blockchain advocate. “If you have the right skills, 90% of the information is already on-chain. The rest remains in centralized hands.”

That vision suggests something radical: a new way to fund, verify, and distribute journalism—one that breaks free from corporate influence and clickbait economics.

A New Model for a New Era

Imagine a platform where journalists pitch story ideas directly to the public. Readers could fund investigations using cryptocurrency, cutting out traditional gatekeepers like editors or advertisers. Or, picture a marketplace where everyday citizens commission the stories they care about most—effectively hiring journalists to pursue the truth on their behalf.

To keep things honest and transparent, smart contracts—self-executing pieces of code on the blockchain—could be used. These contracts might release funds in stages, only after certain milestones are met. And the blockchain itself could store a detailed, unchangeable record of every article—sources, edits, timestamps—building a digital paper trail that can’t be erased or rewritten.

Reporters could even earn digital tokens as rewards for impactful work, with readers voting on the most valuable stories. These tokens might hold real-world value or act as symbols of credibility—kind of like a decentralized Pulitzer Prize.

A Reality Check: The Rise and Fall of Civil

Of course, this isn’t just theory. In 2017, a venture called Civil set out to bring blockchain journalism to life. It had big ideas: token-based governance, decentralized funding, and a platform built on trust. But Civil stumbled. Its system was confusing, its technology too complex for most people, and its financial backing ran dry. In the end, Civil didn’t fail because the vision was flawed—it failed because the execution didn’t match the real-world needs of journalists and readers.

What Needs to Change

For blockchain journalism to succeed where Civil fell short, it needs to keep a few things in mind:

Make it simple. Most people don’t want to learn crypto jargon just to support a good story. The experience needs to be as easy as reading your favorite news site.
Mix funding sources. Relying entirely on crypto is risky. A healthier model could blend subscriptions, grants, and partnerships with more traditional media.
Solve the real problem. Blockchain is a tool, not a cure-all. The deeper issue is trust—how do you rebuild faith in journalism in a polarized, skeptical world? Technology can help, but only if it’s used in service of human values.

Reimagining the Mission

At its heart, the crisis facing journalism isn’t just about money or technology—it’s about belief. Belief in truth. In accountability. In the idea that facts still matter. Blockchain might offer new ways to support and safeguard that mission, but it can’t do the work alone.

The real question isn’t whether blockchain can save journalism. It’s whether we, as a society, are willing to invest in a new kindof journalism—one that’s transparent, collaborative, and deeply rooted in public service.

Technology can build the scaffolding. But the heart of journalism? That still belongs to people.

The 2023 Writers Strike: A Battle of Wits and Whimsy

Konsume Media

-

May 7, 2023

0

In the midst of a writer’s strike that has shaken the foundations of the news media industry, a peculiar question emerges: Should we extend a sympathetic hand to those poor wordsmiths who are losing the battle against their nemeses, the AI algorithms? It’s a tale of wit versus artificial intelligence, and the outcome could shape the future of news as we know it. But before we take sides, let’s dive into this unexpected clash and explore the curious world of creative words and witty machines.

Picture this: A group of writers, picket signs held high, their faces etched with determination. “Down with the machines!” they shout, their fervor echoing through the streets. Meanwhile, AI algorithms, armed with an arsenal of algorithms and vast datasets, continue to churn out articles at an astonishing pace. It’s an unconventional war, where keyboards and code collide in a quest for journalistic dominance.

But is there room for sympathy? After all, writers have long been the guardians of creativity and storytelling. They weave words like magic spells, captivating readers with their prose and imaginative musings. They’re the masters of wit, injecting humor and surprise into their narratives. And yet, here come the AI algorithms, armed with their machine-learned tricks, generating text that can sometimes make us question if Shakespeare himself has risen from the grave.

Let’s face it: AI algorithms can be surprisingly funny. They can analyze vast amounts of data, decipher trends, and produce content that tickles our funny bones with precision. Whether it’s a hilarious parody or a satirical take on current events, these digital jesters can leave us in stitches. But amidst the laughter, a nagging question lingers: Can they truly replace the human touch?

As we ponder the fate of writers in the AI era, we must also consider the subtle nuances that humans bring to the table. It’s the quirkiness, the unexpected turns of phrase, and the sheer delight of witnessing an author’s unique voice that makes us fall in love with the written word. AI algorithms, for all their computational prowess, still struggle to replicate that elusive charm.

So, dear audience, as the battle rages on between writers and their AI adversaries, let us not forget the magic that lies within human creativity. Sympathy or not, it’s a moment in history where wit and whimsy face off against cold logic and computational prowess. The outcome remains uncertain, but one thing is for sure: The power of the written word, whether authored by humans or machines, will continue to shape the world we live in.

In the end, maybe there’s room for both. After all, who’s to say AI algorithms can’t join the picket line with cleverly designed signs that read, “Writers of the world, unite! We’re here to provide comic relief!” It’s a brave new world indeed.

Top 5 News Leaders in January

News Media

Lance Rinker

-

January 25, 2021

0

Which news publications have been the ‘top performing’ ones based on publishing frequency, quality of news, and online reach? We track all of that and here’s a look at the top online news publications for January so far (January 1 – 21).

The Atlantic
It’s been difficult for most publications to get away from focusing coverage on the COVID-19 pandemic, vaccines, and former President Donald Trump but The Atlantic has done a great job of varying their news coverage overall. Though, their coverage has still been slanted towards coverage of right-wing extremism overall in January – and for good reason.

Top Article: Ta-Nehisi Coates on Donald Trump’s Legacy

NPR
NPR has spent a large portion of their time this month focused on President Joe Biden’s transition into the White House, the inauguration, the Capitol riot, and COVID-19. None of that should be much of a surprise, as it’s a trend we’ve seen among all major news publishers for January. However, they’ve also provided great coverage on topics ranging from equality, female empowerment, and bird photography.

Top Article: Dominion Voting Sues Former Trump Lawyer, Seeking More Than $1.3B in Damages

The New York Times
There’s been a clear focus of coverage from this publisher and that is providing as much in-depth reporting as possible on COVID-19, the vaccine roll-outs, and politics. With so much focus on these core topics may not realize they also cover other things within business, sports, human interest, and so on. But, they’re riding the major topics as any leading publisher would.

Top Article: Simon & Schuster Cancels Plans for Senator Hawley’s Book

Politico
Politico used their platform and voice to put more coverage emphasis on former President Trump’s potential 2024 run, the second impeachment trial, and what Trump’s legacy as President will actually be. There’s also been plenty of digital ink spilled detailing the many challenges President Biden may potentially face early on in his administration.

Top Article: Trump Loyalist to be Installed as NSA’s Top Lawyer

NBC News
Aside from frequent and prolific coverage focused on COVID-19, NBC News probably offers meaningful coverage on the widest variety of topics. They covered the major political stories, but also covered topics such as the Doritos ad that went viral, the death or hospitalization of celebrities such as Larry King and former Bond girl Tanya Roberts, and human interest stories from around the globe.

Top Article: Trump Approval Remains Stable in new NBC Poll, with Republicans Unmoved After Capitol Violence

Honorable Mention:

Time
Al Jazeera
The Star
CBS News
MSNBC

Fox News Led in Online News Coverage of Trump After Capitol Riots and Insurrection

Lance Rinker

-

January 21, 2021

0

Fox News Led in Online News Coverage of Trump After Capitol Riots and Insurrection

Fox News, the frequent sole provider of news and information for former President Donald Trump, has effectively pretended to abandon coverage of him and the ‘Big Lie’ since the violent and deadly riots and insurrection at the Capitol on January 6. The truth is they’ve moved and ratcheted up much of their coverage online.

From December 1, 2020 through January 5, 2021 they published 83 different articles. That number dwarfs coverage provided by other online outlets such as MSNBC, NYTimes, and even Breitbart.

Much of the coverage during this time was tied to Trump’s impact on the runoff Senate elections in Georgia, his calling for bigger payments to Americans via the Covid relief package, and the ‘Big Lie’ regarding widespread election fraud.

From January 6 through January 20, 2021 FoxNews.com published articles online covering Trump 90 different times. It makes sense given what had taken place at the Capitol – there is a lot of information to provide to the public.
While much of the coverage before the Capitol riots focused on the aforementioned ‘Big Lie,’ their post-insurrection coverage shifted focus.

The major topics became the violation of Trump’s free speech rights after his Twitter ban, the second impeachment, and calls for investigation into whether it was actually ANTIFA that incited the violence at the Capitol and not Trump supporters.

They may have suddenly dropped coverage and promotion of the allegations of widespread voter fraud and a stolen election, but they didn’t tone down the divisive nature of their reporting and actually churned out more of it.

As a majority of corporate America, a portion of republican politicians, and conservative news outlets try to put distance between them and their support and enablement of Trump over the previous four-plus years, the data behind online news coverage from an outlet like Fox News suggests it’s really just a shell game being played for the sake of appearance and to protect future interests.